People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
(PETA) kills thousands of defenseless pets each
year at its Virginia headquarters. Since 1998, PETA has killed 31,190 adoptable dogs, cats, puppies, and
kittens instead of trying to find them forever homes and loving families.
PETA's own records report for 2013 (filed with
the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services) shows that PETA
employees killed 82 percent of the
dogs and cats in their care last year. During all of
2013, PETA found adoptive homes for just 46 pets. In contrast to
this the Norfolk SPCA, in the same city as Peta, euthanized 3% of the animals
they took in. Why would PETA, a supposed "animal rights" group, kill
so many animals at its headquarters? The answer is simple and disgusting:
Killing adoptable cats and dogs—and storing the bodies in a walk-in freezer
until they can be cremated - requires far less money and effort than caring for
them until they are adopted.
PETA has a $33 million annual budget. But instead of
investing in the lives of the thousands of animals in its care, the group
spends millions on media campaigns telling Americans that eating meat, drinking
milk, fishing, hunting, wearing leather shoes, and benefiting from medical
research performed on lab rats are all "unethical". And yet PETA has
no problem with the unethical practice of killing of killing 96 percent of the
animals in their care.
Years of public outrage hasn't convinced PETA to
eliminate its pet killing program. Now the death toll of animals in PETA's care
has reached over 31,000, including 1,792
pets in 2013.
Who is the person behind this slaughter house?
Her name is Ingrid Newkirk and she is, in my opinion, the most
disgusting, unethical and evil person of them all. In 2003 it was learned for
the first time that Ingrid Newkirk has another face. During the 1970's her
chosen profession was "dog catcher" and killer. Newkirk describes her fondness for killing
in her own words: "I'd go to work
early, before anyone got there, and I would just kill the animals myself...I
must have killed a thousand of them, sometimes dozens every day." She was so good at it she rose through
the ranks to become director of District of Columbia's high-kill pound where
she reigned for some years. There, under her rule, untold thousands more died.
Pets Killed by PETA
Year | Received | Transferred | Adopted | % Adopted | Killed | % Killed |
2013 2012 2011 | 2,175 1,877 2,050 | 311 130 34 | 46 23 28 | 2.1% 1.2% 1.2% | 1,792 1,675 1,965 | 82.46% 89.2% 95.9% |
2010 | 2,345 | 63 | 44 | 1.9% | 2,200 | 93.8% |
2009 | 2,366 | 31 | 8 | 0.3% | 2,301 | 97.3% |
2008 | 2,216 | 34 | 7 | 0.3% | 2,124 | 95.8% |
2007 | 1,997 | 35 | 17 | 0.9% | 1,815 | 90.9% |
2006 | 3,061 | 46 | 12 | 0.4% | 2,981 | 97.4% |
2005 | 2,165 | 69 | 146 | 6.7% | 1,946 | 89.9% |
2004 | 2,655 | 1 | 361 | 13.6% | 2,278 | 85.8% |
2003 | 2,224 | 1 | 312 | 14.0% | 1,911 | 85.9% |
2002 | 2,680 | 2 | 382 | 14.3% | 2,298 | 85.7% |
2001 | 2,685 | 14 | 703 | 26.2% | 1,944 | 72.4% |
2000 | 2,681 | 28 | 624 | 23.3% | 2,029 | 75.7% |
1999 | 1,805 | 91 | 386 | 21.4% | 1,328 | 73.6% |
1998* | 943 | 125 | 133 | 14.1% | 685 | 72.6% |
TOTAL | 35,833 | 1,015 | 3,224 | 9.0% | 31,190 | 87.04% |
Why do those in our government who say they are
for the protection of animals and those in the animal protection movement not
only tolerate this woman but also defend her? Nathan Winograd, the author of “Redemption:The Myth of Pet Overpopulation
and the No Kill Revolution in America” and a former
prosecuting attorney wrote:
"Engrave this in stone: As soon as Newkirk
and her pro-killing cultish devotees are gone, PETA will immediately,
completely, and without reservation embrace the No Kill philosophy and become
one of its leading champions. When that happens; when her actions are
thoroughly and completely seen by everyone for what they truly are; when she is
condemned and finally, finally, thankfully, finally, we don’t have to hold our
breath, clench our teeth, shake with rage, or cry at the thought of what PETA
did to those poor animals, we will all be left wondering just what took us so damned
long to rise up and stop this villain in our midst."
For those who support PETA and those
who entrust the care of their animals to PETA, you are not only helping and
supporting the slaughter of your own pet, but you are supporting the slaughter
of many other defenseless animals as well. If you want to help
homeless animals then support your local Shelter or Rescue Group. Ask them
exactly how they use the money donated to them. Unlike PETA, most of them will
talk to you and answer your questions and won't secretly go back to killing
animals once you leave. And if you're not completely comfortable with their
answers, there's probably a really good reason so you may want to move on to
another.
On a personal note, I have said many times now
and will say again in closing - The next time Ingrid, or anyone else at PETA,
gets the urge to euthanize. I would suggest they put the needle in their own
arms and do the animal community a huge favor.
For more information on PETA read:
The Butcher of Norfolk (6th Edition) by Nathan J. Winograd
Records are from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Revised 02/17/2014
The Butcher of Norfolk (6th Edition) by Nathan J. Winograd
Records are from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Revised 02/17/2014
No comments:
Post a Comment